Subject	Re: Unexpected weight savings >>
Posted by	ouikikazz on September 04, 2007 at 3:33 AM
	This message has been viewed 60 times.
In Reply To	Unexpected weight savings >> posted by Ted (92TT) on September 04, 2007 at 02:52 AM
Message	could it possibly have something to do with the door mounted seat belts in the older doors?
Follow Ups	Unexpected weight savings >> - Ted (92TT) 02:52:08 09/04/07 is it like that for the 2+2 also?? how much weight we saving (n/m) - AllAboutDaZ 03:26:27 09/04/07 Re: Unexpected weight savings >> - ouikikazz 03:33:09 09/04/07 I'd be inclined to follow this line of reasoning. (n/m) - Guapo 10:43:54 09/04/07 Cutouts where the belt mounts remain unchanged - Ted (92TT) 11:20:06 09/04/07 I knew there was something in the newer style doors that - spyhunterTT(nj) 05:15:33 09/04/07 Cost cutting FTW (n/m) - ENVYMYZ 09:37:11 09/04/07 My thoughts exactly. Cost down, price up :( (n/m) - Ted (92TT) 11:05:32 09/04/07 Possibly the '94 door is a JDM ?? - LitlElvis 12:37:30 09/04/07 Interesting.. yes, that is a possibility (n/m) - Ted (92TT) 15:14:31 09/04/07 I think this is the correct answer - JT-Australia 22:46:54 09/04/07 nice catch! (n/m) - apostrophe28 20:03:45 09/04/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.